Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Converting Magazine

Differences in film properties and manufacturing methods used to produce them

March 4, 2008

Let’s start with cast-film properties. In the cast-film process, a molten polymer is extruded from a slot die and pulled against the chill roll by a vacuum box, an air knife, an electrostatic pinning system or a nip roll. Each of these methods “pins” the melt to the roll surface to remove heat from the melt curtain to form the solid film. The film is then stripped from the roll over another roll which may be heated, or cooled to further set the film properties. At this point, the film morphology has been set. The morphology means the crystalline structure and any orientation caused in the formation of the film. Crystalline region size and level in the film will control the barrier properties, the stiffness (modulus) of the film, the thermoforming behavior and, to some degree, the optical properties (see internal haze posting). Cast films are generally low in orientation and give high levels of elongation, excellent tear resistance and impact resistance or toughness. This makes it a good inner layer in laminations as a sealant. Coextruded cast films can be used to enhance the seal-initiation temperature and winding characteristics.

For some polymers such as HDPE, the crystallinity will be set at film formation. For PP, the crystallinity will continue to increase over a three- to seven-day period due to secondary crystallization, and polyester can be quenched to give an essentially amorphous sheet. For the case PP, the continuation of the crystallization will cause the film to tighten as the density increases with the increasing crystallinity and perhaps form baggy lanes in the film. All of these properties are controlled by the quenching of the film during casting. Increasing or decreasing the casting temperature and the roll heat transfer will greatly modify the final film properties obtained and is a key aspect of the film property development (the structure property relationship).

In many manufacturing locations, we will find two lines which are said to be exactly the same but which inexplicitly give different results. But if both lines are exactly the same, how can this be? Well in many instances, the two lines, which are exactly the same were made at different times. Consequently, they just look the same on the outside but they are quite different on the inside, especially the cast roll. What does this matter? Well, the cast roll controls the quenching of the film, and this controls the morphology of the film, or the internal structure of the polymer molecules. This, of course, will control the physical properties as I explained above. In order to make the same film from both lines, you will need to insure that the film experiences the same thermal history. To do this you can measure the heat transfer coefficients of each roll and then design the process to give the same film temperatures. A simple way to do the same thing is to measure the actual film temperatures at various points around the cast roll on Line 1 (making “good” film). Next, measure the film on the second line and adjust roll  temperatures to give the same temperatures at the same location on the cast roll as measured on the first line at the same line speed. If you can achieve the same thermal history in the film, then you will obtain the same physical properties.

Posted by Eldridge Mount on March 4, 2008 | Comments (3)
Industries: Flexible Packaging

May 25, 2008
In response to: Differences in film properties and manufacturing methods used to produce them
Medhat commented:

How does the draw down ratio affect on the film properties?


March 11, 2008
In response to: Differences in film properties and manufacturing methods used to produce them
Eldridge Mount commented:

Question: Is it true that cast pp is stiffer than blown PP? Consider the case, where everything is the same including the PP material and gauge. I know that a more oriented film will make the crystalline structure uniform thus making it’s density higher. Hello Jimmy, this is hard to answer in any exact way because the casting and blowing conditions used will change the stiffness (modulus) a great deal. The film stiffness will depend on the percent crystallinity (density), the average crystal size and the molecular orientation in the film. In general the blown film might be stiffer due to the haul off rate or draw down from the die (ratio of film thickness to die gap or melt velocity at the die to the film speed) and the slower cooling rate of the blown film relative to the cast film. Blown film properties will also depend greatly on the balance between draw down and blow up ratio used to produce the film. The higher the blow up ratio used, the higher the TD stiffness and the lower the MD stiffness (at constant draw down). However, in cast films the film is formed by drawing the film from the die and rapidly quenching which can lock in some MD orientation, but there is no appreciable TD orientation. Also the quenching rate is high so the film is generally clearer due to smaller (and perhaps fewer) crystals. This combines to make the cast film potentially less stiff than the blown film. If I want to increase the stiffness of the cast film I could increase the casting temperature optimizing the crystallization rate and increase the crystal size and perhaps percentage and this would generally increase the film stiffness and haze. So you can see that there is no real single answer (figures) to fit all circumstances. In general the blown film will have higher levels of residual molecular orientation and will on average be stiffer due to its manufacturing conditions. This also shows up as increased thermal shrinkage. In regards to the blown film crystalline structure and higher density of the blown film, the stiffness will depend on the density as it is a measure of the amount of crystallinity in the film which correlates to stiffness (modulus) But the blown film also tends to be more oriented as well giving a higher modulus relative to the cast films.


March 10, 2008
In response to: Differences in film properties and manufacturing methods used to produce them
jimmy commented:

Is it true that cast pp is stiffer than blown PP? Consider the case, where everything is the same including the PP material and gauge. I know that a more oriented film will make the crystalline structure uniform thus making it’s density higher.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
CONVERTING NEWSLETTERS
Frontline News
OEM Update



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   Useful Sites   |   RSS
© 2010 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy