Recent Posts
- ANTEC Conference
- Not too technical
- Extrapolation, Comparison and Use of Polymer Melt Viscosity Data using curve fit data
- Melt disturbance onset from increasing line speed
- Viscosity driver of coextrusion melt disturbance
- Coextruding films without defects
- PVC-PET shrinkage and shrink labels
- The impact of polymer density on substrates
- FDA approval of a film
- Curl of coextruded films
Recent Comments
- rakatin on Substrate surface quality
- Eldridge Mount on Temperature profile on a chill roll
- Jimmy on Temperature profile on a chill roll
- Eldridge Mount on Reply to Jimmy's question
- juan on Dimensional stability considerations
Most Commented On
- Matte surfaces (4)
- Differences in film properties and manufacturing methods used to produce them (2)
- Dimensional stability considerations (2)
- Reply to Jimmy's question (2)
- Temperature profile on a chill roll (2)
Archives
Blog
Substrate surface quality
December 27, 2007
The quality of a substrate's surface is solely dependent on what the substrate is to be used for. This spills over into the type of substrate such as paper, polyester (PET) film or oriented polypropylene (OPP) film, or shrink film to name a few. What do I mean? Well, with PET film the applications are oftentimes technical or industrial applications, and you are purchasing the film for its surface quality, while for shrink film or OPP you are buying the film for its surface area and perhaps some special attributes such as saleability or printability. In some cases, you are purchasing the film for both its surface area and its surface quality as in packaging labels. The choice between coverage and quality is sometimes controlled by the polymer density as lower densities give more square inches of film for pound of polymer (the yield, in2/lb or m2/km). In the case of labels the overlap comes from the need, or desire, for a graphic-arts quality printing surface with large yields as compared to the reverse surface printing of packaging by flexo or gravure, which appears to allow more surface defects in the films.
However, there are several overarching substrate properties, in no particular order, which will define the surface “quality” of the substrate (for the application). First is the freedom from contamination, second is the surface texture (smoothness or matte at the extremes), next might be freedom from physical blemishes (gels, bubbles, degraded polymer, foreign particles, and scratches), surface-energy level (treatment or polymer type), and adhesion level. Other properties will be important based on the application. We will begin to explore these surface quality features in more detail in future posts. Of course, if you have a particular interest in one, let me know and I can start with that one.
Posted by Eldridge M. Mount on December 27, 2007 | Comments (1)
In response to: Substrate surface quality
rakatin commented:
hi, im a bit confused here, when a laminated 15 mic nylon/50 pe runs in our treside forming machine, powder will tend to build up on the triangle forming frame.But when using a thicker 70 microns PE with same materials and slip percentage, no buildups occurs.With the case of the pp slip, that you mentioned above. as thickness increase we have to reduce slip.but in this case the thinner gauge tend to powder compared to the thicker gauge.DO I NEED TO TEST THE COF VALUE OF THIS 2 FILM. p.s we are planning to get either extrusion coating machine or extrusion lamiantion machine. would you give me an idea what the difference between this two process. Actually we want to laminate printed opp to vmpet without the bubbles problem, thats why we are consdiering this process.What the best process for our requirement. thanks